Same. But I dont think it means anything

When did you submit your secondary? I'm also OOS but mine is still under review!

July 8th

Do you mind copying and pasting what the status said exactly? I'm curious since I'm still waiting for a status update!

Your application to The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences is complete and has been reviewed by the Admissions Committee. To date, no final decision has been made and the Admissions Committee has placed your application on hold for re-review at a later date. Files are re-reviewed by the committee periodically and there is no set schedule for decisions. We do interview from August through March. Please feel free to update your file during this time using the GW Admissions Portal. If we require any further documentation or if your status changes, we will contact you immediately. We do sincerely appreciate your interest in our program. Thank you for your patience.

Is the pre-II hold basically a soft R? I just checked my portal and the same message showed up too

Specifically for GW no I wouldn't see it that way based on how chaotic previous cycles have been. They also say re-review at a later date, no final decision has been made etc. "We haven't sent you an interview at this time" is all you can really make of that here.

I talked to a student he said that its way to early they don't start sending interview invitations until August so if they have looked at your application and havent rejected you thats a good thing but wait until mid August to start getting idea of what it means

https://www.aamc.org/news/ai-will-now-read-your-medical-school-application

GW is apparently using AI for the screening

Koutroulis, at GW SMHS, notes that for many years, computer programs in many medical schools have sorted applications by basic criteria, mostly academic scores, that send some applications to an effective “no” pile and leave others to be reviewed by the admissions committee.

Admissions leaders stress that the AI tools produce recommendations, not decisions, and will be reviewed by staff to confirm that the admissions criteria have been met and to decide whom to invite for interviews.

“This is not something that will replace human review,” Koutroulis says.