anonymous:
IS under review. Waiting for II.
when did you submit
justintran1010:
anyone oos get a secondary yet after submitting the mission statement request? have ties to washington with parents as a second home
I am OOS and I got my secondary on 8/6.
RadicalPreMed:
I am OOS and I got my secondary on 8/6.
when did you submit the mission statement?
anonymous:
when did you submit the mission statement?
Received and submitted my mission statement on 7/31.
oshawott would like to request the UW MSTP office to please send more ii soon
I submitted my MSTP primary on August 5. When might I expect to hear back re: secondary invitations? Will I?
anonymous:
I submitted my MSTP primary on August 5. When might I expect to hear back re: secondary invitations? Will I?
they got my MSTP primary on august 4 and i got a secondary the next morning. on the md/phd reddit, many reported either not hearing back or getting rejected. their screening criteria seems to be pretty vague but i'd imagine it has to do something with research fit moreso than stats. they claim to read every primary in full and only send 1 in 4 applicants a secondary
oshawottMDPhD:
they got my MSTP primary on august 4 and i got a secondary the next morning. on the md/phd reddit, many reported either not hearing back or getting rejected. their screening criteria seems to be pretty vague but i'd imagine it has to do something with research fit moreso than stats. they claim to read every primary in full and only send 1 in 4 applicants a secondary
Crazy turnaround
I should also mention that I am an OOR applicant
anonymous:
Crazy turnaround
I should also mention that I am an OOR applicant
am OOR too, east coast with no ties. however my research area is a very strong fit (and my stats r p good), which is why i think i got a secondary so fast.
oshawottMDPhD:
am OOR too, east coast with no ties. however my research area is a very strong fit (and my stats r p good), which is why i think i got a secondary so fast.
Same, east coast no ties
I believe I also have a very strong research fit, but lower stats (516/3.95) so maybe that's why