JavaScript is disabled on your browser.

Please enable JavaScript or upgrade to a JavaScript-capable browser to use this site.

28d ago

Stanford vs UCSF

Excited and grateful for the opportunity to attend these schools, but going back and forth on which to pick. Would appreciate any opinions/advice or comments on other things to consider. No aid packages yet, but cost will likely be similar for me.

 

Stanford:

Pros:

-P/F clinicals, close to support system (same as UCSF)

-Has home residency in current preferred specialty

-Lots of $ for students to conduct research

-I like the pre-clinical schedule with T/Th afternoons and Wed free. Gives time for me to pursue other interests.

-Like the scholarly concentration. Provides space in curriculum to pursue other interests.

-Opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration (important to me as I am interested in translational engineering/medical research)

 

Cons:

-Less clinical diversity and large public health system exposure (compared to UCSF)

-Likely need car during clinicals (same as UCSF)

-Some commuting but just for particular clinical rotations.

-Was a grad student for several years at Stanford, might benefit from new environment / learning how medicine is done elsewhere / expanding my network for future collaborations.

-Would be interested in residency here, but grad school + med school + residency feels like a long time at one institution, and might not provide as much space for growth.

 

 

UCSF:

Pros:

-P/F clinicals, close to support system (same as Stanford)

-Strong clinical diversity

-Opportunities for new research projects and collaborations, particularly clinical (my feel is that there is more emphasis on clinical research at UCSF than at Stanford? Could be wrong about this.)

-Living in a new city and enjoying city life. Lived in a big city in undergrad and loved it. I miss it now.

-More non-trads / older students (according to MSAR). Not sure how big of a pro, as Stanford also seems to have a good number of non-trads (though less, proportionally, in recent years than UCSF)

-No undergrad campus. Not necessarily a pro or con for me. It means less opportunities for interdisciplinary work, but at this point in my life, might feel nice to live in the city rather than on/close to an undergrad campus. (Stanford feels like a bubble sometimes since if you live on campus, you don't really need to leave much…)

 

Cons:

-Does not have home residency in current preferred specialty. However, did match several students to top programs in my preferred specialty last year. (So not necessarily a con?)

-Less $ for students (for research, etc.)

-Likely need car during clinicals (same as Stanford)

-Major commuting in general during clinicals and potentially pre-clinical depending on where I am able to get housing (students tend to live pretty dispersed in the city and have many rotation sites that require public transit or driving to get to).

-Renting in SF is expensive and difficult. If I stay at Stanford, I could keep living where I am now (relatively lower rent for me, at least for now).

-Slightly worried and unsure about how strongly social justice themes might be emphasized in the curriculum and how that balances with other parts of the curriculum. I haven't been able to find clear info online about the Bridges curriculum and what it's like in practice.

Feel free to let me know if you think there's something else I should consider. Also would love to know what current med students at these schools think of the vibe.

0